Learning the Cadastral Data Content Standard
Presented by the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, and
the Federal Geographic Data Committee Cadastral Subcommittee
A Adams County, Illinois - a description of a highway department implementation of the Standard ALP, USDA Forest Service Analysis Level and Transactional Level of Use of Cadastral Data - Osage County, Kansas Example Attributes Assumptions Used in Developing the Standard B Benefits of Standardizing Boulder County Clerk And Recorder Office C Cadastral Data User Levels/Types of Users Canyon Country Partnership - Share Codes Example Cardinality Clark County Recorder Office Clearinghouse Columbia County, Wisconsin Compliance County Recorder Module Crosswalk, Exercise D Dane County, Wisconsin - Example of Cadastral Data Exchange Dane County Register Of Deeds Office Data Modeling Links and References Definition of Cadastral Data Description of the Standard Diagram Conventions Directory of Entities and Attributes Dubuque County, Iowa - Example of Presentational Use of Data E Entities and Associations Entity Relationship Diagram Exchange of Cadastral Data - Dane County Example F Foreign Keys Framework G Glossary H History and Background Leading to the Standard I Introduction L Logical Models vs Physical Models M Maricopa County Recorders Office Metadata Standard Minnesota Example - An Example of Presentational Use of Cadastral Information Maintenance of the Standard Mission and Goals of the Cadastral Data Content Standard Model - Logical Groupings Legal Area Entities Parcel Entities Boundary Entities Corner Entities Restriction Entities Transaction Entities Agent Entities Model - Overview of the Cadastral Data Content Standard Model Attributes Cardinality Diagram Conventions Entities and Associations Entity Relationship Diagram Foreign Keys O Oneida County, Wisconsin - Example OpenGIS Osage County, Kansas - Analysis Level and Transactional Level of Use of Cadastral Data; a cooperative effort to develop parcel coverage of urban areas P Presentational Use of Cadastral Information - Dubuque County, Iowa Example Presentational Use of Cadastral Information - Minnesota Example Process Used to Develop the Standard R Recorder, County S SDTS - Spatial Data Transfer Standard State of Washington - a first step toward implementing the Standard Support, User and Technical T Timeline in Developing the Standard Transfer Profile, Cadastral Data Translation Exercises Columbia County, Wisconsin Translation Exercise Yuma, Arizona Translation Exercise Special Warranty Deed Translation Exercise U Utah County Recorders Office Users and the Standard, Examples Adjudicator - Use Authorization Appraiser County Recorder GPS - Counties Getting Control Data National Mapping - Plotting - Planning Map PLSS Section Corner Recovery Uses of the Standard, Intended W Welcome Page When to Standardize, and when NOT to Standardize Y Yuma, Arizona
Links to the Course Sections and Modules: [Quick
Reference] [Introduction]
[Section
1: Purpose and Benefits of the Cadastral Data Content Standard] [Section
2: How the Standard Was Developed] [Section
3: Other Standards and Related Activities] [Section
4: Data Modeling Techniques, Rules and Diagram Conventions] [Section
5: Crosswalks, Translations, and Examples] [Section
6: Understanding Compliance with the Standard] [Section
7: Maintenance of the Standard] [Section
8: User and Technical Support] [County
Recorder Module] [GIS
Specialist Module] [Surveyor
Module] [Glossary]
Learning the Cadastral Data Content Standard
Presented by the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, and
the Federal Geographic Data Committee Cadastral Subcommittee