Notice in the answers below to the Columbia County translation exercise that there are a number of "n/a" entries, indicating that some of the Columbia County parcel data have no correspondence with any entity or attribute in the Standard's logical model. This should help remind you when it comes time to translate your own data to the Standard that there will likely be parts of your data that will not correspond with the Standard.

Return to Section 5 which led to this exercise, or use the links below to go to another exercise, or any of the other Course Sections.

For additional practice, go to the Yuma, Arizona Translation Exercise, or the Special Warranty Deed Translation Exercise

Links to the Course Sections and Modules: [Quick Reference] [Introduction] [Section 1: Purpose and Benefits of the Cadastral Data Content Standard] [Section 2: How the Standard Was Developed] [Section 3: Other Standards and Related Activities] [Section 4: Data Modeling Techniques, Rules and Diagram Conventions] [Section 5: Crosswalks, Translations, and Examples] [Section 6: Understanding Compliance with the Standard] [Section 7: Maintenance of the Standard] [Section 8: User and Technical Support] [County Recorder Module] [GIS Specialist Module] [Surveyor Module] [Glossary]