County Recorders And The

Cadastral Data Content Standard

- Part Two -

County Examples


County Recorder offices around the country are at varying stages of automation and making information available to the public.  Automated access is being provided over the Internet, as well as by means of other computer access such as via modem and terminal use in public rooms.

Organizations such as NACRC and IACREOT have formed committees (such as the Property Records Industry Joint Task Force) which work to bring consistency to the property records industry, and to address new ways of approaching the Internet and electronic recording.

The FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standard offers a basis of cadastral definitions and entity/attribute relationships which may be used any time individual counties or associations of professionals in the property records industry address automation.

Use the links below to investigate examples of a few counties and their current methods of automating their data and making data available to the public.


Utah County, Utah - advanced in-house and on-line access to County Recorder data.
Maricopa County, Arizona - example plat map information crosswalked to the Cadastral Data Content Standard
Clark County, Nevada
Dane County, Wisconsin -  example of Register Of Deeds data crosswalked to the Cadastral Data Content Standard.
Boulder County, Colorado


Links To Other Parts Of The County Recorder's Module:

Part One - County Recorders And The Cadastral Data Content Standard

Part Three - Using The Standard


Table Of Contents - County Recorders and the Cadastral Data Content Standard

Links to the other Cadastral Courses:
Learning The Cadastral Data Content Standard
Cadastral Information For GIS Specialists
Surveyors And The Cadastral Data Content Standard


Presented by the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, and

the Federal Geographic Data Committee Cadastral Subcommittee